Electrical · Free · Instant results

APFC Capacitor Size Calculator

Calculate Smarter. Work Faster.

Free APFC capacitor sizing calculator — enter your kW load, current PF, and target PF to get the required capacitor kVAr and nearest standard bank size.

Load & Power Factor Details

Enter your load and current/target power factor to size the required APFC capacitor.

kVAr = kW × (tanφ₁ − tanφ₂) φ = cos⁻¹(PF)
Required Capacitor
— kVAr

Enter your details and hit calculate

Next Common Bank Size — kVAr
kVA Reduction — kVA
Original vs Corrected kVA
— → —
Did this solve your problem?

Created by Umasankar Maity — B.Tech in Electrical Engineering, with 11+ years of industrial experience.

Reviewed by the ElectroMechCalc editorial team.

Last reviewed: August 2026  |  Engineering terminology and calculations follow commonly used power-factor correction methods; final equipment selection should be checked against applicable IEC, IEEE, NEC, BIS, or other local requirements.

How it works

Understanding APFC Capacitor Sizing

APFC capacitor kVAr formula: kVAr = kW × (tanφ₁ − tanφ₂), where φ₁ and φ₂ are the angles for the current and target power factor — for example, correcting a 100 kW load from PF 0.75 to PF 0.95 needs roughly 55 kVAr of capacitors. An Automatic Power Factor Correction (APFC) panel improves the power factor of an electrical installation by switching in capacitor banks that supply reactive power locally, reducing the reactive (kVAr) component that the utility supply and the upstream transformer would otherwise have to carry. Most industrial and commercial loads — induction motors, transformers, welding sets, and lighting ballasts — are inductive in nature, meaning they draw current that lags behind voltage, and that lag is exactly what a power factor number is measuring.

This calculator works out exactly how much capacitive reactive power, in kVAr, needs to be added to bring a load from its existing, poor power factor up to a desired, improved target power factor. The active power in kW drawn by the load stays constant — correction does not change how much real work is being done — but the reactive power in kVAr drawn from the supply reduces as the power factor improves, which also reduces the total apparent power in kVA that the supply needs to deliver for the same job.

kVA reduction. Beyond the capacitor size itself, this calculator also shows the original and corrected apparent power in kVA side by side, since this is what ultimately determines transformer loading, cable sizing, and utility demand charges. A lower kVA for the same real kW load means headroom is freed up on the upstream supply without adding any additional real load — often enough extra capacity to add a new machine or expand a line without upgrading the transformer.

In practice, this calculation is used by electrical engineers and panel designers to correctly size an APFC panel for a factory, commercial building, or any installation with a poor power factor. Capacitors are commonly available in fixed reference steps rather than continuously variable sizes, and the calculator rounds up to the nearest common bank size — a useful preliminary reference when discussing an APFC panel with a qualified designer or manufacturer, alongside system voltage, frequency, load profile, and harmonic conditions.

kW, kVA, and kVAr — The Power Triangle Explained

Every AC electrical load involves three related quantities that together form what's called the power triangle. kW (kilowatt) is the real, or active, power — the actual useful work the load performs, whether that's spinning a motor shaft, producing heat, or lighting a room. kVA (kilovolt-ampere) is the apparent power — the total power the supply has to deliver, calculated simply as voltage multiplied by current, without regard to how much of it is doing useful work. kVAr (kilovolt-ampere reactive) is the reactive power — the portion of apparent power that doesn't do any useful work but is still drawn from the supply, mostly to build and collapse magnetic fields in motors, transformers, and other inductive equipment.

These three quantities relate to each other geometrically as a right-angled triangle: kW forms the base, kVAr forms the vertical side, and kVA is the hypotenuse. Mathematically, kVA² = kW² + kVAr², which is just the Pythagorean theorem applied to power. The angle between the kVA hypotenuse and the kW base is called φ (phi), and the cosine of that angle, cos(φ), is exactly what we call the power factor. A power factor of 1.0 (or unity) means φ = 0°, meaning there's no reactive component at all and kVA equals kW exactly. A power factor of 0.75 means a significant chunk of the apparent power is reactive rather than real, so the supply has to carry more current than the real work alone would require.

Power factor correction using capacitors works because capacitors are also reactive devices, but their reactive power is exactly opposite in phase to inductive reactive power. When a capacitor bank is connected in parallel with an inductive load, the capacitor's leading reactive power cancels out part of the load's lagging reactive power at the point of connection. The motor or transformer still draws the same reactive power it always needed internally, but that reactive power now circulates locally between the capacitor and the load instead of having to travel all the way back through the cables, meters, and transformer from the utility supply — which is why correction reduces current draw on the supply side without touching the real kW being consumed.

Formula Used for Capacitor kVAr

The standard formula for calculating the required capacitor kVAr to move from an existing power factor to a target power factor is:

Capacitor kVAr = kW × (tanφ₁ − tanφ₂) φ₁ = cos⁻¹(Current PF) φ₂ = cos⁻¹(Target PF) Where: tanφ₁ = tangent of the current power-factor angle, tanφ₂ = tangent of the target power-factor angle

The intuition behind this formula follows directly from the power triangle. At the existing power factor, the reactive power the load draws is kW × tanφ₁ (since tanφ equals kVAr divided by kW in the triangle). At the target power factor, the reactive power the load should draw from the supply is kW × tanφ₂. The difference between these two reactive-power values is exactly the amount of reactive power the capacitor bank needs to locally supply, so that the supply only has to provide the smaller, corrected reactive component going forward.

Once the required kVAr is known, this calculator also works out the resulting apparent power before and after correction, using kVA = kW ÷ PF at both the current and target power factor. The difference between these two values — the kVA reduction — is what shows up directly as freed-up transformer, cable, and switchgear capacity.

Worked Example: 100 kW Load, PF 0.75 → 0.95

Take a factory load of 100 kW running at a poor power factor of 0.75, which needs to be corrected to a target power factor of 0.95.

Step 1 — Find the angles. φ₁ = cos⁻¹(0.75) ≈ 41.41°, and φ₂ = cos⁻¹(0.95) ≈ 18.19°.

Step 2 — Find the tangents. tanφ₁ ≈ 0.882, and tanφ₂ ≈ 0.329.

Step 3 — Apply the formula. Capacitor kVAr = 100 × (0.882 − 0.329) ≈ 55.3 kVAr.

Step 4 — Round to the nearest standard size. Since APFC capacitor banks are supplied in fixed steps (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 kVAr and larger), the nearest standard size at or above 55.3 kVAr is a 60 kVAr capacitor bank.

Step 5 — Check the kVA reduction. Before correction, kVA = 100 ÷ 0.75 ≈ 133.3 kVA. After correction, kVA = 100 ÷ 0.95 ≈ 105.3 kVA. That's a reduction of roughly 28 kVA for the same 100 kW of real load — capacity that's now freed up on the transformer and incoming cables without adding a single extra kW of actual work.

Why Power Factor Correction Matters

Many commercial and industrial electricity tariffs use power factor, apparent-power demand, or reactive-energy charges to influence the cost of a poor power factor, though the exact mechanism and threshold vary by utility and jurisdiction. Beyond tariff considerations, a poor power factor also means higher current for the same real power, which increases I²R losses in cables and transformer windings, causes larger voltage drops, and can force premature upgrades of transformers, cables, and switchgear that would otherwise have had sufficient headroom.

Correcting power factor with a properly sized APFC panel is one of the more cost-effective electrical improvements available to a facility, since it can eliminate or reduce penalty charges and defer infrastructure upgrades — though the actual financial payback depends strongly on the site's tariff structure, operating hours, load profile, and installation cost. This calculator gives the core sizing number — the required kVAr — that any APFC panel design starts from, before moving on to detailed considerations like step configuration, switching sequence, and harmonic filtering.

How to Use This APFC Calculator

Getting an accurate capacitor sizing only takes three inputs:

  1. Enter your connected load in kW — this should be the real, active power drawn by the load or facility, typically available from an energy meter or electricity bill.
  2. Enter your current power factor — also usually available from the energy meter, electricity bill, or a power quality analyzer reading. It will be a decimal value less than 1, such as 0.75 or 0.80.
  3. Enter your target power factor — the power factor you want to achieve; 0.95 or higher is a commonly used target, though the exact threshold that avoids tariff-related charges depends on your utility and contract. Click Calculate Capacitor kVAr to get the required kVAr, the nearest standard capacitor bank size, and the resulting kVA reduction.

Common Mistakes When Sizing APFC Capacitors

  • Using nameplate kW instead of actual metered kW. A motor's nameplate rating is its maximum design output, not what it's actually drawing on average — always size correction around real, metered load data where possible.
  • Correcting to unity power factor (1.0). Overcorrection risks pushing the power factor leading rather than lagging during light-load periods, which some tariffs or grid requirements also charge for or limit, and which can cause voltage rise on the bus — most designs target 0.95 to 0.98, not 1.0.
  • Ignoring load variation. A fixed capacitor bank sized for full load will overcorrect during low-load periods; this is why real APFC panels use automatic step switching (hence "Automatic" in APFC) rather than a single fixed capacitor.
  • Skipping harmonic assessment. Facilities with variable-frequency drives, UPS systems, or other non-linear loads generating harmonics need detuned reactors in series with the capacitors to avoid resonance — this calculator does not account for harmonic filtering.

Reference: Standard Capacitor Bank Sizes (kVAr)

Standard Size Typical Use
5 – 20 kVArSmall workshops, individual machines
25 – 60 kVArSmall-to-mid factories, commercial buildings
75 – 150 kVArMid-size industrial installations
200 kVAr+Large industrial plants (multiple banks/steps)

Formula Used

Capacitor kVAr = kW × (tanφ₁ − tanφ₂) φ₁ = cos⁻¹(Current PF) φ₂ = cos⁻¹(Target PF) Where: tanφ₁ = tangent of current PF angle, tanφ₂ = tangent of target PF angle

Example: Load = 100 kW, current PF = 0.75, target PF = 0.95. φ₁ = cos⁻¹(0.75) ≈ 41.41°, φ₂ = cos⁻¹(0.95) ≈ 18.19°. tanφ₁ ≈ 0.882, tanφ₂ ≈ 0.329. kVAr = 100 × (0.882 − 0.329) ≈ 55.3 kVAr. Select the nearest standard size → 60 kVAr capacitor bank, which also drops the apparent power from about 133 kVA down to roughly 105 kVA for the same 100 kW real load.

Reference: The power-triangle relationship used here is the standard method taught across electrical engineering courses and applied in industrial power factor correction panel design. This calculator is for preliminary, educational sizing only and does not replace a detailed harmonic and resonance study for the final APFC panel design.

Standard Individual Capacitor Unit Sizes and APFC Panel Steps

APFC panels are built from individual capacitor units switched in and out by contactors as steps, rather than one single fixed capacitor, so that the total connected kVAr tracks the load automatically. The table below lists the common individual unit sizes manufacturers stock, along with an approximate contactor rating and typical step arrangement used to build up a larger panel — useful when specifying a panel rather than just a single capacitor bank total.

Unit Size (kVAr)Approx. Rated Current (415V, 3-ph)Indicative Contactor Current ClassCommon Panel Step Arrangement
5 kVAr7.0 A12–16 A1st step, fine adjustment
10 kVAr13.9 A20–25 ASmall panel base step
15 kVAr20.9 A32 AMid-size step
20 kVAr27.8 A40 AStandard mid step
25 kVAr34.8 A50 AStandard mid step
30 kVAr41.7 A63 ALarger installations, base step
40 kVAr55.6 A63–75 ALarger installations
50 kVAr69.6 A80–100 ALarge panel base step
60 kVAr83.5 A100 ALarge panel step
75 kVAr104.3 A125 ALarge panel step
100 kVAr139.1 A150–160 AHeavy industrial panel step

Rated current shown is for a 415 V three-phase capacitor bank. These are indicative values only; final contactor, fuse, cable, and protection selection must follow the capacitor manufacturer's data and applicable standards — including the standard capacitor inrush current multiplier (commonly 1.3–1.5× rated current for a plain contactor, or use dedicated capacitor-duty contactors) and any series detuned reactor.

For example, a panel needing to correct up to 130 kVAr total might be built from a fixed 50 kVAr base capacitor plus four 20 kVAr switched steps, giving fine control between 50 and 130 kVAr in 20 kVAr increments — rather than one oversized fixed 130 kVAr bank that cannot track a varying load without risking overcorrection during light-load hours.

Why It Matters

The Real Cost of a Poor Power Factor

Many utilities worldwide apply a low-power-factor penalty (or, conversely, a rebate for a high power factor) directly on the monthly bill, on top of the reduced infrastructure headroom a poor power factor causes. The table below illustrates the effect on apparent power (kVA demand, which many tariffs bill against) for a fixed 100 kW real load at different power factors:

Power Factor kVA Demand (100 kW load) Extra kVA vs 0.95 PF
0.70142.9 kVA+37.6 kVA
0.80125.0 kVA+19.7 kVA
0.90111.1 kVA+5.8 kVA
0.95105.3 kVA

At 0.70 PF, the same 100 kW of useful work demands nearly 43 kVA more from the supply than at 0.95 PF — that's extra transformer, cable, and switchgear capacity being consumed for zero additional output, which is exactly what utility power-factor penalty clauses are designed to discourage. Beyond the direct billing impact, correcting power factor also frees up existing transformer and cable capacity for genuine load growth, often deferring or avoiding a costly infrastructure upgrade.

Common mistakes in APFC sizing

1. Sizing for average load instead of peak reactive demand. APFC panels should be sized (and step-switched) against the actual reactive demand profile, not a single average figure, or the system will under-correct during peak periods and risk overcorrection during light load.

2. Ignoring harmonics from VFDs and other non-linear loads. Standard capacitor banks can resonate with harmonics generated by variable-frequency drives, LED drivers, or UPS systems, leading to capacitor overheating and failure — detuned reactors may be needed where harmonic levels and resonance risk justify them, based on a harmonic assessment of the installation.

3. Using too few switching steps. A panel with only 2-3 steps struggles to track a fluctuating load precisely, causing frequent hunting between under- and over-correction — 6-12 steps is common in many industrial APFC panels, though the optimum number depends on how much the reactive load varies and the desired control resolution.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Content last reviewed: July 2026 · Reference: standard power-triangle method

Why does a poor power factor matter if my real power (kW) doesn't change? +

A poor power factor means the supply has to carry more apparent power (kVA) than the real work (kW) actually being done, since extra reactive current flows to and from the load. This larger current increases losses in cables and transformers, can trigger utility power-factor penalty charges, and eats into the available capacity of your electrical infrastructure even though no additional useful work is happening.

What target power factor should I correct to? +

Most utilities require or incentivize a power factor of 0.90–0.95 or higher, and many electrical codes and panel designers commonly target 0.95–0.99. Correcting all the way to unity (1.0) is technically possible but rarely done, since it offers diminishing returns and increases the risk of overcorrection (leading power factor) if the load varies.

Can I overcorrect and get a "leading" power factor? +

Yes — if the installed capacitor kVAr exceeds what the actual running load needs (for example, during light-load periods), the power factor can swing leading rather than lagging, which some tariffs or grid requirements also charge for or limit, and which can cause voltage rise issues. This is why APFC panels use automatic step switching rather than a single fixed capacitor bank, adding or removing steps as the load changes.

Does correcting power factor reduce my electricity bill? +

It doesn't reduce the real energy (kWh) consumed, since that reflects actual work done, but it typically eliminates or reduces utility low-power-factor penalty charges, which are common in industrial and commercial tariffs. It can also allow more load to be added to an existing transformer or supply connection without upgrading capacity.

What is the difference between kW, kVA, and kVAr? +

kW is real power, the actual work done by the load. kVA is apparent power, the total power the supply has to deliver. kVAr is reactive power, the non-working component drawn by inductive loads like motors and transformers. The three form a right-angled power triangle, where kVA is the hypotenuse of kW and kVAr, and the power factor is the cosine of the angle between kVA and kW.

Does this replace a full APFC panel design? +

No — this is a preliminary, educational sizing estimate for the total required kVAr. A full APFC panel design also needs to account for step sizing and switching sequence, harmonic filtering (detuned reactors where variable-frequency drives or other harmonic-generating loads are present), and protection coordination, ideally reviewed by a qualified electrical engineer.

Do I need detuned reactors with my capacitor bank? +

If your facility has significant harmonic-generating loads — VFDs, UPS systems, LED lighting drivers, or arc/induction furnaces — yes. Plain capacitors can resonate with these harmonics and fail prematurely or overheat; detuned reactors (typically tuned to 189 Hz / 7% or 134 Hz / 14%) block this resonance and protect the capacitor bank.

How many switching steps should my APFC panel have? +

This depends on how much your reactive load fluctuates through the day. A steady industrial load might need only 4-6 steps, while a facility with widely varying motor/HVAC cycling often benefits from 8-12 finer steps to track demand closely without hunting between under- and over-correction.

Explore More Categories